A guest post describes using ungrading and peer coaching to deepen student thinking and make ChatGPT shortcuts less tempting.
Teaching
AI4Education Education topic
Public readings arranged by original publication date. People and institutions use explicit mappings; article sources remain in their details.
Latest updates
Marc Watkins argues faculty should question when to use AI agents and disclose their use to students.
An English primary-school randomized trial found roughly 24% less planning time with Aila, about 49 minutes weekly, without inferior assessed resources. Use declined during the ten-week trial, and teacher views were mixed.
Selwyn calls for precise, contextual discussion of AI and warns against treating a power user’s experience as universal expertise. Constructive critique should ask what alternative forms of AI and educational practice people want.
Meyer highlights observations about teacher roles, curriculum fit, actionable suggestions and multilingual access, alongside disengaging uses. He asks how people actually use AI before treating capabilities as educational outcomes.
The UNESCO IITE–Shanghai Open University project compares 36 teacher AI competency frameworks, examining competencies, implementation and assessment across policy, curriculum and teaching practice.
Jisc proposes noticing unproductive interactions, judging what AI can reliably handle, and redesigning workflows. Institutions should allocate learning time; a useful outcome may be recognizing when not to use AI.
Coordinating AI competencies across a professional program.
Liu reports on a program at Kaohsiung Girls’ Senior High School in Taiwan emphasizing problem selection, collaboration, AI-supported making and explaining concepts to other learners.
The second retrospective describes AI-built demonstrations and source navigation, while exposing the limits of keyword retrieval.
Teacher workload, student thinking, product evidence and family communication are treated separately.
Chongqing and participant Mizai revisit how a music course found its themes and used live demonstrations.
Across 200 higher education institutions in 19 countries, 87% reported AI use in at least one area, while 26% had a formal AI strategy. The report calls for stronger governance and institutional capability.
A deliberately strong argument locates reasoning and problem-solving in domain knowledge.
Examples of planning and writing ask which cognitive tasks can appropriately be delegated.
Reframing misconduct around incentives and learning.
Rich learning support alongside high-stakes proctoring.
Course purposes and faculty working conditions belong together.
The proposed restriction concerns independent general-purpose AI use, not all instructional software.
The critique asks whether interest-driven writing loses opportunities to consolidate curriculum knowledge.
Hanyang and Liushou discuss moving from an unfamiliar topic to a syllabus, search terms and original sources.
Disclosure as a question of educational relationships.
Laura Zarrow describes a studio course using critique and timed design exercises to develop judgment through making.
A documented design experiment with open uncertainties.
A recent working paper examines the tension between teacher productivity and student experience.
Automation can alter the practice behind an artifact.
Testing the costs and access limits of analog responses.
A classroom case exposes teacher reading, student trust and ambiguous AI feedback.
Freeman revisits a coordinated calculus course of 250–450 students and the compromises required to sustain it.
Performance-based adaptation is distinguished from rewriting every topic around a learner’s interests.
A large redrafting project makes uptake of feedback visible while leaving learning unresolved.
Mollick considers how convenient AI defaults can bypass the effort through which people develop valued abilities.
Clark uses known proof tasks and flexible timing to distinguish understanding from spontaneous invention.
The five-department action plan connects AI literacy, university curricula, teacher development, applications and safeguards, with goals for 2030. These are policy directions, not completed implementation or demonstrated learning effects.
Stakeholder conversations surface teacher deskilling and pupils’ wish to be read seriously.
The hosts find that tacit knowledge about files, versions and structure often explains beginners’ difficulties.
Protected writing time, with candid design reversals.
Yuk Hui asks what universities lose when knowledge production and economic utility become their defining purposes.
Talbert separates AI assistance with design and practice from delegating grading itself.
Li Zhengtao argues that educational purposes should shape technology, protecting students’ own thinking and lived learning.
Ipeirotis describes turning exit-ticket responses into targeted follow-up teaching.
A bounded pro-detection stance with acknowledged costs.
Prompt revision driven by feedback overload.
Outlines illustrate a distinction between external memory support and delegating the thinking itself.
Barba and Stegner report small-group live coding for 58 students, including substantial implementation costs.
Gopnik connects exploration, apprenticeship and AI literacy in an interview that preserves disagreement about machine reasoning.
Clark combines flexible practice with selected in-class checks while retaining proof portfolios.
This report tests whether assigning expert identities reliably improves answers to difficult factual questions.
Question quality, accuracy, alternatives and persistence matter beyond fluent explanations.
An exploratory 165-student trial retains message-by-message human supervision and uncertain transfer estimates.
This public lesson extends AI literacy to evaluation: metrics, human preferences, model judges and benchmark contamination.
A skeptical author identifies room for collective experimentation.
GeoAI connects AI-use boundaries to disciplinary goals: help with statistical concepts does not mean outsourcing climate-data interpretation. It suggests staged assignments, reflection and checked practice, with privacy and copyright considerations.
A 34-student course report centered on feedback comparison.
The essay distinguishes productive work from the practice needed to become an expert.
Student-facing strategies, including a failure of flattery.
Willingham describes conferencing as a way to retain and inspect writing-related thinking.
Mollick challenges sensational interpretations of AI studies and examines learning, idea generation and writing practices.
Talbert examines reassessment backlogs, anxiety and practice in a test-heavy course.
Different disciplines, different boundaries and scaffolds.
A teacher-supported six-week programme improved paper-test outcomes, with important attrition and design caveats.
Barba candidly describes a course chatbot and autograder enabling answer-seeking shortcuts.
A mixed-methods study of experience and judgment.
A follow-up finds practical relief but persistent test anxiety and narrower assessment.
A design report explains why unreliable generated questions were replaced with human-written sets.
OU’s designers connect AI literacy with access, bias, environmental and labour questions.
Williams describes staged AI outlining, peer critique and independent writing in an immunology course.
Repeated tests illustrate why a successful answer does not establish a reliable prompting technique.
Reading habits are also an educator’s problem.
Scaffolding collaboration through roles and playtesting.
Talbert documents an emergency redesign of discrete mathematics assessment and the uncertainty behind it.
A 259-teacher trial supports planning-time savings without establishing higher student learning.
A product trial separates teachers’ evaluative judgment from AI-assisted feedback production.
Independent modeling before AI-supported extension.
An early account of process evidence and privacy tradeoffs.
Writing’s retrieval and elaboration benefits must be balanced against novice cognitive load.
Assessment methods must meet their own integrity standard.
This 2024 essay distinguishes confidence in AI detection from the illusion that completed homework means learning.
UNESCO outlines 15 teacher competencies across five dimensions and three progression levels, supporting teacher development and assessment design while foregrounding ethics, human agency and pedagogy.
Earlier classic: reading assistance versus reading replacement.
Earlier classic: ask whether feedback is actually used.