A guest post describes using ungrading and peer coaching to deepen student thinking and make ChatGPT shortcuts less tempting.
Learning
AI4Education Education topic
Public readings arranged by original publication date. People and institutions use explicit mappings; article sources remain in their details.
Latest updates
Lodge reflects on learning, governance and the limits of chatbot-era reform after Digital Learning Week.
Educator Zhang Shuling questions defining children’s worth through an ever-expanding list of abilities AI cannot yet perform. Useful capacities matter, but do not exhaust the purpose of education.
Liu reports on a program at Kaohsiung Girls’ Senior High School in Taiwan emphasizing problem selection, collaboration, AI-supported making and explaining concepts to other learners.
Mollick argues that expertise, breadth, taste and agency help people use AI capabilities. His experiments invite a question: how do learners acquire the knowledge and judgment needed to direct and evaluate increasingly capable tools?
Sumeracki explains Butler et al.’s (2017) experiments contrasting repeated and varied application during retrieval practice. Her account invites asking whether an AI activity makes students retrieve, explain and apply concepts across contexts.
The second retrospective describes AI-built demonstrations and source navigation, while exposing the limits of keyword retrieval.
Teacher workload, student thinking, product evidence and family communication are treated separately.
Chongqing and participant Mizai revisit how a music course found its themes and used live demonstrations.
A deliberately strong argument locates reasoning and problem-solving in domain knowledge.
Rich learning support alongside high-stakes proctoring.
Furze proposes two contextual questions: is this a good use of the technology, and of the learner’s own thinking? He examines accessibility, outsourcing and assessment, questioning whether fixed categories capture individual needs.
The proposed restriction concerns independent general-purpose AI use, not all instructional software.
The critique asks whether interest-driven writing loses opportunities to consolidate curriculum knowledge.
Hanyang and Liushou discuss moving from an unfamiliar topic to a syllabus, search terms and original sources.
Laura Zarrow describes a studio course using critique and timed design exercises to develop judgment through making.
A documented design experiment with open uncertainties.
A recent working paper examines the tension between teacher productivity and student experience.
Automation can alter the practice behind an artifact.
Testing the costs and access limits of analog responses.
Chongqing uses Hinton’s account of understanding to question what learners lose when AI explanations become too smooth.
Medical-science students see value in critiquing AI but resist universal AI integration.
TEQSA’s commissioned report connects adaptive capabilities with disciplinary knowledge and learning-process evidence. It proposes process-focused assessment and support for student judgment, agency and self-regulation.
Hanyang and Chongqing use university choices to question the idea that one decision fixes an entire life path.
Performance-based adaptation is distinguished from rewriting every topic around a learner’s interests.
A large redrafting project makes uptake of feedback visible while leaving learning unresolved.
Mollick considers how convenient AI defaults can bypass the effort through which people develop valued abilities.
The hosts find that tacit knowledge about files, versions and structure often explains beginners’ difficulties.
A Stanford review identified 20 higher-quality causal studies within over 800 K12 AI papers available by October 2025. Assisted performance and unaided learning diverge; long-term, equity and wellbeing evidence remains limited.
Protected writing time, with candid design reversals.
Li Zhengtao argues that educational purposes should shape technology, protecting students’ own thinking and lived learning.
Outlines illustrate a distinction between external memory support and delegating the thinking itself.
Gopnik connects exploration, apprenticeship and AI literacy in an interview that preserves disagreement about machine reasoning.
Question quality, accuracy, alternatives and persistence matter beyond fluent explanations.
An exploratory 165-student trial retains message-by-message human supervision and uncertain transfer estimates.
GeoAI connects AI-use boundaries to disciplinary goals: help with statistical concepts does not mean outsourcing climate-data interpretation. It suggests staged assignments, reflection and checked practice, with privacy and copyright considerations.
A 34-student course report centered on feedback comparison.
The essay distinguishes productive work from the practice needed to become an expert.
Student-facing strategies, including a failure of flattery.
Willingham describes conferencing as a way to retain and inspect writing-related thinking.
Mollick challenges sensational interpretations of AI studies and examines learning, idea generation and writing practices.
A mathematics RCT directly separates assisted performance from subsequent unaided assessment.
A teacher-supported six-week programme improved paper-test outcomes, with important attrition and design caveats.
Barba candidly describes a course chatbot and autograder enabling answer-seeking shortcuts.
A mixed-methods study of experience and judgment.
Wexler challenges interpreting better submitted prose as improved writing ability.
Lodge calls for evidence about learning mechanisms beyond uptake and perceived usefulness.
Reading habits are also an educator’s problem.
Scaffolding collaboration through roles and playtesting.
Independent modeling before AI-supported extension.
Writing’s retrieval and elaboration benefits must be balanced against novice cognitive load.
A randomised feedback experiment separates improved perceptions from no detected improvement in work quality.
This 2024 essay distinguishes confidence in AI detection from the illusion that completed homework means learning.
An author’s inspection of generated book companions reveals losses beyond factual accuracy.
Earlier classic: reading assistance versus reading replacement.
Matuschak distinguishes forgetting from never understanding, and discusses questioning, memory and fading scaffolds. The interview offers a lens for AI tools: do they help learners notice confusion and act, or mainly ease consumption?