Standards-Based Grading Six Years Later
Summary
Freeman revisits a coordinated calculus course of 250–450 students and the compromises required to sustain it.
She abandoned oral exams when inexperienced instructors struggled with consistency, and replaced take-home work with peer review and in-class group quizzes.
Tutor-signature requirements overwhelmed support capacity. Simplification helped workload, but unsuccessful outcomes remained an unresolved problem.
The course coordinator’s longitudinal account provides no reliable cheating rate.
Sources & reading record
- Hilary Freeman · Grading for Growth ↗
- Read the original article body; not every linked resource.