Pitfalls in Evaluating Generative AI — Hung-yi Lee, Lecture 4
Summary
This public lesson extends AI literacy to evaluation: metrics, human preferences, model judges and benchmark contamination.
Examples show how exact matching, attractive presentation and averages can distort judgments of capability. Evaluation begins with deciding what the task actually requires.
The slides recommend validating model judgments on a small scale before expanding use. They offer material for teaching how to scrutinize AI evidence, rather than evidence that AI improves student learning.
Uploaded on 20 October; the class was on 17 October. Slides were read, without a full spoken transcript.
Sources & reading record
- 李宏毅 · 国立台湾大学公开课程 / Hung-yi Lee ↗
- Verified original-channel video metadata. Content summary uses official slide sections on evaluation, bias, prompting and leakage; video not played.
- 李宏毅 · 第4讲官方课件(96页) ↗
- Read extracted text on metrics, LLM judges, prompts and contamination; not all visual content verified.
- 国立台湾大学 · 2025秋课程目录 ↗
- Checked objectives, FAQ, schedule and official video/slide links.