GIFT-AI: teaching the game and leveling the field

Summary

A 34-student course report centered on feedback comparison.

The report examines peer and AI feedback, reflection and revision for 34 business-writing students; 10 of 46 enrolled across two sections opted out. Examples show students challenging generic advice and protecting their voice.

The evidence supports examining implementation and experience. Self-report, revision quality and later unaided transfer remain different questions.

No randomized control; 34-person analysis differs from cited 654-person project.