Peer coaching before writing may reduce AI shortcuts
A guest post describes using ungrading and peer coaching to deepen student thinking and make ChatGPT shortcuts less tempting.
updatesExplore →
A guest post describes using ungrading and peer coaching to deepen student thinking and make ChatGPT shortcuts less tempting.
Marc Watkins argues faculty should question when to use AI agents and disclose their use to students.
Furze argues chatbot framing hides corporate responsibility and misdirects education's assessment debates.
★A randomized trial of teacher planning time helps distinguish time savings from student learning outcomes.
An English primary-school randomized trial found roughly 24% less planning time with Aila, about 49 minutes weekly, without inferior assessed resources. Use declined during the ten-week trial, and teacher views were mixed.
Lodge reflects on learning, governance and the limits of chatbot-era reform after Digital Learning Week.
★Specify the technology, setting and experience before treating AI in education as a single object.
Selwyn calls for precise, contextual discussion of AI and warns against treating a power user’s experience as universal expertise. Constructive critique should ask what alternative forms of AI and educational practice people want.
★Separate human worth from lists of capabilities that AI cannot replace, adding a perspective on educational purposes.
Educator Zhang Shuling questions defining children’s worth through an ever-expanding list of abilities AI cannot yet perform. Useful capacities matter, but do not exhaust the purpose of education.
No matching updates.
An index of research, practice, policy and debate on AI in education, across universities, schools and families, with the original source and date for every entry.