The black box of AI assessment
A vendor’s validity review recognizes that stable scores can still reward the wrong learning.
updatesExplore →
A vendor’s validity review recognizes that stable scores can still reward the wrong learning.
The authors question assessment designs that depend on detecting and excluding wearable assistance.
Clark uses known proof tasks and flexible timing to distinguish understanding from spontaneous invention.
The five-department action plan connects AI literacy, university curricula, teacher development, applications and safeguards, with goals for 2030. These are policy directions, not completed implementation or demonstrated learning effects.
Tifflin asks markers to make conceptual grasp, evaluative judgment and transfer visible.
A Wharton team tests how embedded instructions affect AI grading, finding important differences across models and conditions.
No matching updates.
An index of research, practice, policy and debate on AI in education, across universities, schools and families, with the original source and date for every entry.