Two validity conversations in a time of AI
Summary
Dawson separates validating AI assessors from validating assessment when students have AI access.
One question concerns automated judgments of competence; another concerns evidence of student capability under uncontrolled AI access.
Dawson argues that wearable systems expose the fragility of designs relying on clean separation from AI.
Device-capability and market figures were not independently verified.
Sources & reading record
- Phillip Dawson · Medical Education ↗
- Read the open-access commentary, declarations and publication metadata.