AI is uncannily good at judging writing
Summary
A large vendor report concerns judging agreement, not student learning.
No More Marking reports roughly 70,000 scripts from 177 secondary schools, with AI agreeing with 83% of 133,983 human comparisons. Most schools used approximately 90% AI judging.
Pairwise comparison replaces direct marking while retaining teachers. Agreement on a jointly constructed scale still needs independent validation; reliability, bias, susceptibility to gaming and learning are separate questions.
Vendor account, not independent validity evidence or a delayed, unaided writing test.
Sources & reading record
- Daisy Christodoulou / No More Marking ↗
- Read byline, date and article body; not every external reference was independently checked.
- No More Marking: author’s methodological clarification ↗
- Read the author’s 9 November 2025 clarification that human and AI comparisons jointly construct the scale.