https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/All AI in Education entries in this scope. pubDate is collection time; original publication dates are stated separately.enhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-819698a8b7938efe/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-819698a8b7938efe/A guest post describes using ungrading and peer coaching to deepen student thinking and make ChatGPT shortcuts less tempting. Original publication date: 2026-10-12 Source notes peer coaching falls flat without scaffolding, modeling, or practice. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/talking-is-also-thinkingTue, 13 Oct 2026 06:26:40 +0000teachinglearningassessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-81e99090daa88ecf/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-81e99090daa88ecf/Marc Watkins argues faculty should question when to use AI agents and disclose their use to students. Original publication date: 2026-10-11 Opinion excerpt, not research; full text not read; no outcomes verified. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/discernment-in-the-age-of-agentsTue, 13 Oct 2026 06:25:05 +0000assessmentpolicyteachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-654463be053f361b/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/auto-654463be053f361b/Furze argues chatbot framing hides corporate responsibility and misdirects education's assessment debates. Original publication date: 2026-10-08 This is an opinion excerpt; the Medicare and product claims are the author's, not independently verified here. https://leonfurze.com/2026/10/08/beyond-chatbots-convenient-costume/Tue, 13 Oct 2026 03:23:03 +0000policyassessmenttheorytoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dawson-validity-over-cheating-20240808/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dawson-validity-over-cheating-20240808/The authors place cheating within the broader question of defensible judgments about capability. Original publication date: 2024-08-08 A historical 2024 conceptual essay; its full text was not read in this pass. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/187950Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:22 +0000assessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-reading-social-media-20250126/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-reading-social-media-20250126/Reading habits are also an educator’s problem. Original publication date: 2025-01-26 https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/reading-in-the-age-of-social-mediaWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-reading-machines-20260722/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-reading-machines-20260722/A documented design experiment with open uncertainties. Original publication date: 2026-07-22 This site did not run the website described. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/reading-in-an-age-of-thinking-machinesWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-duty-care-20260823/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-duty-care-20260823/Course purposes and faculty working conditions belong together. Original publication date: 2026-08-23 “Duty of care” is the author’s normative proposal. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/our-duty-of-care-in-the-age-of-aiWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-detector-trust-20260503/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-detector-trust-20260503/A personal trial raises questions about labels and trust. Original publication date: 2026-05-03 The author’s personal tests were not reproduced and vendor accuracy was not verified. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/how-an-ai-detector-made-me-trustWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmenttoolstheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-deceptive-assessment-20241103/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-deceptive-assessment-20241103/Assessment methods must meet their own integrity standard. Original publication date: 2024-11-03 Appeal outcomes are the author’s prediction. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/deceptive-assessment-has-no-placeWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentpolicyteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-analog-sustainability-20260708/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/watkins-analog-sustainability-20260708/Testing the costs and access limits of analog responses. Original publication date: 2026-07-08 Classroom examples are mostly reported by the author. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/analog-is-having-a-moment-but-isWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingpolicylearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-progress-institutions-20251003/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-progress-institutions-20251003/A skeptical author identifies room for collective experimentation. Original publication date: 2025-10-03 The author’s impressions from visits. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2025/10/03/we-dont-need-retreat-challenge-ai-schoolsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-peer-response-20250328/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-peer-response-20250328/Feedback quality is only part of peer response. Original publication date: 2025-03-28 https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2025/03/28/generative-ai-not-our-peerWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingassessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-outsourcing-real-work-20260709/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-outsourcing-real-work-20260709/Automation can alter the practice behind an artifact. Original publication date: 2026-07-09 The medical example comes from another report. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2026/07/09/ai-scribes-medicine-are-short-circuiting-thinkingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-morality-cheating-20260828/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-morality-cheating-20260828/Reframing misconduct around incentives and learning. Original publication date: 2026-08-28 Cited research and student accounts were not independently checked in this pass. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2026/08/28/integrity-great-you-cant-eat-good-moralsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentteachingtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-integrity-llm-20241206/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/warner-integrity-llm-20241206/What should a course credential actually certify? Original publication date: 2024-12-06 The 2024 prediction about detection capability is not treated as current fact. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2024/12/06/we-cant-let-chatgpt-make-lie-out-educationWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/pairr-formative-assessment-20250423/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/pairr-formative-assessment-20250423/A mixed-methods study of experience and judgment. Original publication date: 2025-04-23 No direct writing-gain or AI-feedback bias evaluation. https://escholarship.org/content/qt9v91m137/qt9v91m137.pdfWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentteachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/pairr-business-writing-20250916/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/pairr-business-writing-20250916/A 34-student course report centered on feedback comparison. Original publication date: 2025-09-16 No randomized control; 34-person analysis differs from cited 654-person project. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/communication/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1615752/fullWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingassessmentlearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-using-ai-feedback-20250719/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-using-ai-feedback-20250719/Student-facing strategies, including a failure of flattery. Original publication date: 2025-07-19 Use requires checking the specific course’s rules. https://annamills.substack.com/p/getting-the-most-out-of-ai-feedbackWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-pairr-prompts-20260127/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-pairr-prompts-20260127/Prompt revision driven by feedback overload. Original publication date: 2026-01-27 Prompts were not run; student satisfaction and learning outcomes are different measures. https://annamills.substack.com/p/ai-feedback-customized-for-studentWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingassessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-human-intent-materials-20260807/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-human-intent-materials-20260807/Disclosure as a question of educational relationships. Original publication date: 2026-08-07 https://annamills.substack.com/p/lets-emphasize-human-effort-and-intentWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-detection-reconsidered-20260207/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-detection-reconsidered-20260207/A bounded pro-detection stance with acknowledged costs. Original publication date: 2026-02-07 Detection accuracy and fairness were not verified. https://annamills.substack.com/p/a-brief-update-why-im-still-usingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentteachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-authorship-beta-20241114/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mills-authorship-beta-20241114/An early account of process evidence and privacy tradeoffs. Original publication date: 2024-11-14 The 2024 test account is not a current software guide. https://annamills.substack.com/p/trying-out-grammarly-authorship-betaWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmenttoolsteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/classic-watkins-ai-reading-20240503/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/classic-watkins-ai-reading-20240503/Earlier classic: reading assistance versus reading replacement. Original publication date: 2024-05-03 Historical product descriptions are not current facts. https://marcwatkins.substack.com/p/no-one-is-talking-about-ais-impactWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/classic-warner-meaningful-feedback-20240205/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/classic-warner-meaningful-feedback-20240205/Earlier classic: ask whether feedback is actually used. Original publication date: 2024-02-05 https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/columns/just-visiting/2024/02/05/ai-cant-read-why-pay-attention-its-feedback-writingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000assessmentteachingtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-wetzel-design-accelerator-20250121/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-wetzel-design-accelerator-20250121/Scaffolding collaboration through roles and playtesting. Original publication date: 2025-01-21 https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/16470938-ai-as-design-accelerator-with-ryan-wetzelWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-uva-ai-assignments-20250520/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-uva-ai-assignments-20250520/Different disciplines, different boundaries and scaffolds. Original publication date: 2025-05-20 Four teachers’ separate implementation accounts. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/17190682-ai-integrated-assignments-with-kiera-allison-jamie-jirout-spyros-simotas-jun-wangWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-seitz-in-class-writing-20260310/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-seitz-in-class-writing-20260310/Protected writing time, with candid design reversals. Original publication date: 2026-03-10 Based on the teacher’s account and course feedback. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/18794328-in-class-writing-with-james-seitzWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-li-technical-courses-20241119/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-li-technical-courses-20241119/Independent modeling before AI-supported extension. Original publication date: 2024-11-19 The interview looks back at a 2023 classroom. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/16129553-teaching-with-ai-in-technical-courses-with-jingjing-liWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-gulya-student-agency-20260813/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-gulya-student-agency-20260813/Student choice within shared course goals. Original publication date: 2026-08-13 Claims of learning assurance and workload reduction were not independently checked. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/19640762-ai-and-student-agency-with-jason-gulyaWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingassessmentlearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-bernards-online-math-20260825/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-bernards-online-math-20260825/Rich learning support alongside high-stakes proctoring. Original publication date: 2026-08-25 Inferences from submission speed are not evidence of cheating. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/19696094-ai-aware-online-math-teaching-with-jessica-bernardsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachinglearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-barnett-curriculum-20260922/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bruff-barnett-curriculum-20260922/Coordinating AI competencies across a professional program. Original publication date: 2026-09-22 The interview does not report learning outcomes after implementation. https://intentionalteaching.buzzsprout.com/2069949/episodes/19843873-curricular-responses-to-ai-with-deborah-barnettWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:51:04 +0000teachingpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/williams-ai-assessment-immunology-20250306/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/williams-ai-assessment-immunology-20250306/Williams describes staged AI outlining, peer critique and independent writing in an immunology course. Original publication date: 2025-03-06 A small descriptive case; compliance with limits outside class was not verified. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10206017/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unisq-assurance-dashboard-20260621/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unisq-assurance-dashboard-20260621/UniSQ’s team describes a prototype connecting program outcomes, tasks and assessment security. Original publication date: 2026-06-21 The author describes a prototype; this site did not run it. https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/what-does-assurance-of-learning-actuallyWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicytoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/tifflin-marking-now-20260406/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/tifflin-marking-now-20260406/Tifflin asks markers to make conceptual grasp, evaluative judgment and transfer visible. Original publication date: 2026-04-06 https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/what-are-we-going-to-do-about-markingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/teqsa-enacting-reform-20250924/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/teqsa-enacting-reform-20250924/TEQSA compares program-wide, unit-level and hybrid approaches to assurance of learning. Original publication date: 2025-09-24 The PDF path contains 2026-06; its cover and publication page both date to September 2025. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/corporate-publications/enacting-assessment-reform-time-artificial-intelligenceWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/tam-student-ai-assessment-20260629/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/tam-student-ai-assessment-20260629/Medical-science students see value in critiquing AI but resist universal AI integration. Original publication date: 2026-06-29 13% response rate, one discipline and possible selection bias; read the repository accepted manuscript. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10228028/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentlearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-test-forward-20250602/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-test-forward-20250602/Talbert examines reassessment backlogs, anxiety and practice in a test-heavy course. Original publication date: 2025-06-02 https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/alternative-grading-in-a-test-forwardWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-six-ai-grading-uses-20260302/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-six-ai-grading-uses-20260302/Talbert separates AI assistance with design and practice from delegating grading itself. Original publication date: 2026-03-02 Example programs were not run; privacy judgments belong to the author. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/six-ways-to-use-artificial-intelligenceWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-horizon-grading-20260810/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-horizon-grading-20260810/Talbert argues that changing tasks without changing grading leaves a core incentive problem untouched. Original publication date: 2026-08-10 Cited research was not checked individually. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/three-ways-alternative-grading-addressesWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-ai-grading-triage-20250113/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-ai-grading-triage-20250113/Talbert documents an emergency redesign of discrete mathematics assessment and the uncertainty behind it. Original publication date: 2025-01-13 Suspicion is not confirmed cheating; the approach was provisional in 2025. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/how-ai-is-changing-my-grading-approachWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-ai-grading-reflection-20250407/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/talbert-ai-grading-reflection-20250407/A follow-up finds practical relief but persistent test anxiety and narrower assessment. Original publication date: 2025-04-07 https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/my-ai-driven-grading-changes-a-3x3x3Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/steel-plausible-validity-20251019/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/steel-plausible-validity-20251019/Steel explains why assessment security alone does not establish a valid learning inference. Original publication date: 2025-10-19 https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/valid-assessment-is-a-plausible-argumentWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/smith-online-modality-risk-20260628/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/smith-online-modality-risk-20260628/Online-education practitioners challenge the assumption that physical attendance alone assures learning. Original publication date: 2026-06-28 https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/modality-does-not-equal-riskWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/qaa-perfect-storm-20260707/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/qaa-perfect-storm-20260707/QAA examines the gap between institutional AI policies and students’ day-to-day assessment experience. Original publication date: 2026-07-07 Self-selected participants; no explicitly anti-GenAI staff participated. Not a nationally representative survey. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/news-events/policy-and-leadership/state-of-the-nationWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ou-student-ai-guidance-20250715/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ou-student-ai-guidance-20250715/OU distinguishes prohibited, permitted and required use, with disclosure and accessibility guidance. Original publication date: 2025-07-15 The date is the explicit revision date; the rules apply at the OU. https://about.open.ac.uk/policies-and-reports/policies-and-statements/generative-ai-learning-teaching-and-assessment-ou-0Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ou-critical-ai-responsible-design-20250317/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ou-critical-ai-responsible-design-20250317/OU’s designers connect AI literacy with access, bias, environmental and labour questions. Original publication date: 2025-03-17 The energy-use analogy was not independently checked. https://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/learning-design/?p=2288Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000teachingpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/lodge-real-learning-impact-20250209/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/lodge-real-learning-impact-20250209/Lodge calls for evidence about learning mechanisms beyond uptake and perceived usefulness. Original publication date: 2025-02-09 Cited studies were not all reread. https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/what-to-do-about-artificial-intelligenceWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000learningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/lodge-global-conversation-20261004/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/lodge-global-conversation-20261004/Lodge reflects on learning, governance and the limits of chatbot-era reform after Digital Learning Week. Original publication date: 2026-10-04 Survey, PISA and commercial cases were not independently checked. https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/the-global-conversation-on-ai-inWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000learningassessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/liu-bridgeman-trust-agency-20250601/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/liu-bridgeman-trust-agency-20250601/Sydney’s designers explain the rationale for open learning tasks alongside secured capability checks. Original publication date: 2025-06-01 The designers’ explanation concerns the 2025 Sydney institutional context. https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/why-banning-ai-in-assessment-is-allWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ipeirotis-rizakos-voice-oral-20260318/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ipeirotis-rizakos-voice-oral-20260318/Two cohorts show operational feasibility, while agreement among model graders does not establish validity. Original publication date: 2026-03-18 Two cohorts in one course with simultaneous changes; the 2025 blog belongs to the same research lineage. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18221 https://www.behind-the-enemy-lines.com/2025/12/fighting-fire-with-fire-scalable-oral.htmlWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ipeirotis-exit-tickets-20260215/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/ipeirotis-exit-tickets-20260215/Ipeirotis describes turning exit-ticket responses into targeted follow-up teaching. Original publication date: 2026-02-15 Efficiency is teacher-reported; data-protection claims concern the NYU context. https://www.behind-the-enemy-lines.com/2026/02/listening-to-my-students-at-scale-exit.htmlWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/freeman-grading-six-years-20260615/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/freeman-grading-six-years-20260615/Freeman revisits a coordinated calculus course of 250–450 students and the compromises required to sustain it. Original publication date: 2026-06-15 The course coordinator’s longitudinal account provides no reliable cheating rate. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/standards-based-grading-six-yearsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dawson-two-validities-20260917/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dawson-two-validities-20260917/Dawson separates validating AI assessors from validating assessment when students have AI access. Original publication date: 2026-09-17 Device-capability and market figures were not independently verified. https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/medu.70320Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-wicked-assessment-20250903/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-wicked-assessment-20250903/Interviews with 20 educators reveal competing assessment goals and unavoidable trade-offs. Original publication date: 2025-09-03 One Australian university, purposive recruitment and deductive analysis; not a reform effectiveness trial. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/rest/bitstreams/980f72c9-50a8-4632-8a04-823a5858b791/retrieveWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheorypolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-wearable-ai-assessment-20260424/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-wearable-ai-assessment-20260424/The authors question assessment designs that depend on detecting and excluding wearable assistance. Original publication date: 2026-04-24 Reading scope was the publisher index’s abstract and main passages. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2026.2661367Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheorypolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-talk-is-cheap-20250515/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-talk-is-cheap-20250515/The authors distinguish compliance-dependent instructions from changes to assessment structure. Original publication date: 2025-05-15 Only the publisher index’s abstract and main argument passages were read; direct access returned 403. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheorypolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-assessment-research-agenda-20251203/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/corbin-assessment-research-agenda-20251203/An assessment research agenda asks for precise practices, historical grounding and connected inquiry. Original publication date: 2025-12-03 The webpage dates to 3 December; the PDF says 4 December. https://open-publishing.org/journals/index.php/jutlp/article/view/2533Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/clark-small-changes-ai-20251215/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/clark-small-changes-ai-20251215/Clark combines flexible practice with selected in-class checks while retaining proof portfolios. Original publication date: 2025-12-15 The survey is self-reported; the author acknowledges difficulty enforcing the original ban. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/small-changes-to-handle-aiWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/clark-mastery-exams-20260413/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/clark-mastery-exams-20260413/Clark uses known proof tasks and flexible timing to distinguish understanding from spontaneous invention. Original publication date: 2026-04-13 Classes have at most 24 students; anxiety is self-reported. https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/mastery-examsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bugeja-generalist-programme-assessment-20260215/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bugeja-generalist-programme-assessment-20260215/The authors address fragmented evidence in flexible generalist degrees. Original publication date: 2026-02-15 https://needednowlt.substack.com/p/strengthening-validity-and-trustWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/barba-stegner-conversational-exam-20260115/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/barba-stegner-conversational-exam-20260115/Barba and Stegner report small-group live coding for 58 students, including substantial implementation costs. Original publication date: 2026-01-15 “Cannot be faked” is the author’s strong claim; validity and fairness were not independently verified. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10691Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/barba-embracing-genai-failure-20250503/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/barba-embracing-genai-failure-20250503/Barba candidly describes a course chatbot and autograder enabling answer-seeking shortcuts. Original publication date: 2025-05-03 The date is the author manuscript’s public deposit, not the manuscript’s March date or August issue. https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Experience_embracing_genAI_in_an_engineering_computations_course_What_went_wrong_and_what_next/28926647Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000assessmentteachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/alsaiari-emotional-feedback-20241019/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/alsaiari-emotional-feedback-20241019/A randomised feedback experiment separates improved perceptions from no detected improvement in work quality. Original publication date: 2024-10-19 Summarises the 2024 preprint; later journal version not fully compared, with no long-term retention or transfer measure. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15077Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:47:56 +0000learningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/willingham-master-before-delegating-20260820/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/willingham-master-before-delegating-20260820/The proposed restriction concerns independent general-purpose AI use, not all instructional software. Original publication date: 2026-08-20 District descriptions were not checked as current rules; the mastery threshold is the author’s proposal. https://dtwuva.substack.com/p/students-should-only-use-ai-for-thingsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/willingham-conferencing-20250708/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/willingham-conferencing-20250708/Willingham describes conferencing as a way to retain and inspect writing-related thinking. Original publication date: 2025-07-08 https://dtwuva.substack.com/p/how-chatgpt-might-inadvertently-improveWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingassessmentlearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-writing-effect-20241109/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-writing-effect-20241109/Writing’s retrieval and elaboration benefits must be balanced against novice cognitive load. Original publication date: 2024-11-09 Underlying studies were not all reread; the author coauthored and supports The Writing Revolution. https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/the-writing-effectWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-selective-edtech-20260913/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-selective-edtech-20260913/Teacher workload, student thinking, product evidence and family communication are treated separately. Original publication date: 2026-09-13 The author has Writing Revolution ties; company privacy and screening-accuracy claims were not verified. https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/dont-throw-ed-tech-babies-out-withWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachinglearningpolicytoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-output-not-learning-20250420/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-output-not-learning-20250420/Wexler challenges interpreting better submitted prose as improved writing ability. Original publication date: 2025-04-20 The underlying paper discussed was not fully read in this pass. https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/do-students-who-rely-on-chatgpt-benefitWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningassessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-offloading-outsourcing-20260118/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-offloading-outsourcing-20260118/Outlines illustrate a distinction between external memory support and delegating the thinking itself. Original publication date: 2026-01-18 https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/is-relying-on-ai-cognitive-offloadingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-alphawrite-curriculum-20260817/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-alphawrite-curriculum-20260817/The critique asks whether interest-driven writing loses opportunities to consolidate curriculum knowledge. Original publication date: 2026-08-17 The product and school were not independently evaluated; the author has Writing Revolution ties. https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/how-alpha-school-teaches-writingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachinglearningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-ai-summaries-foundational-20240505/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-ai-summaries-foundational-20240505/An author’s inspection of generated book companions reveals losses beyond factual accuracy. Original publication date: 2024-05-05 https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/ai-generated-summaries-are-a-problemWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-ai-cognitive-science-20260902/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/wexler-ai-cognitive-science-20260902/Examples of planning and writing ask which cognitive tasks can appropriately be delegated. Original publication date: 2026-09-02 Linked surveys, policies and research were not all independently checked. https://nataliewexler.substack.com/p/how-should-ai-be-used-in-schoolsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingtheorypolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/sungu-ai-teaching-rct-20260720/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/sungu-ai-teaching-rct-20260720/A recent working paper examines the tension between teacher productivity and student experience. Original publication date: 2026-07-20 Original indexed abstract and posting date only; full text returned 403. Methods unaudited; peer review not established. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7007339 https://www.alpsungu.com/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-validity-black-box-20260425/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-validity-black-box-20260425/A vendor’s validity review recognizes that stable scores can still reward the wrong learning. Original publication date: 2026-04-25 Vendor validity argument; raw data, bias and adversarial robustness were not independently tested. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/the-black-box-of-ai-assessmentWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000assessmenttheorytoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-tutor-four-tests-20251116/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-tutor-four-tests-20251116/Question quality, accuracy, alternatives and persistence matter beyond fluent explanations. Original publication date: 2025-11-16 Comparisons such as textbook error rates are the author’s judgments, not measurements in this essay. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/llm-tutors-are-they-any-goodWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachinglearningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-transferable-skills-20260906/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-transferable-skills-20260906/A deliberately strong argument locates reasoning and problem-solving in domain knowledge. Original publication date: 2026-09-06 The cited evidence review was not checked study by study. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/what-if-transferable-skills-dontWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000theorylearningteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-redraft-feedback-20260530/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-redraft-feedback-20260530/A large redrafting project makes uptake of feedback visible while leaving learning unresolved. Original publication date: 2026-05-30 A vendor before/after study of human–AI feedback, without randomization or delayed unaided tests. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/using-ai-feedback-to-improve-writingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000assessmentlearningteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-personalization-interests-20260613/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-personalization-interests-20260613/Performance-based adaptation is distinguished from rewriting every topic around a learner’s interests. Original publication date: 2026-06-13 https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/why-personalising-education-basedWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-learning-not-workflow-20250731/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-learning-not-workflow-20250731/The essay distinguishes productive work from the practice needed to become an expert. Original publication date: 2025-07-31 The author operates an AI assessment business. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/education-isnt-workingWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-human-voice-ai-comments-20241206/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-human-voice-ai-comments-20241206/A product trial separates teachers’ evaluative judgment from AI-assisted feedback production. Original publication date: 2024-12-06 The company’s own implementation report. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/using-ai-to-automate-written-commentsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-feedback-design-20250321/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-feedback-design-20250321/A design report explains why unreliable generated questions were replaced with human-written sets. Original publication date: 2025-03-21 The company’s own product-design account has a commercial interest and is not a guarantee about current versions. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/bringing-our-feedback-philosophyWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingassessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-comparative-judgment-20251025/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-comparative-judgment-20251025/A large vendor report concerns judging agreement, not student learning. Original publication date: 2025-10-25 Vendor account, not independent validity evidence or a delayed, unaided writing test. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/ai-is-uncannily-good-at-judging-writing https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/ai-is-uncannily-good-at-judging-writing/commentsWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000assessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-classroom-marking-case-20260620/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-classroom-marking-case-20260620/A classroom case exposes teacher reading, student trust and ambiguous AI feedback. Original publication date: 2026-06-20 A vendor reports one teacher’s class experience, without independent learning tests or complete time comparisons. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/an-ai-marking-case-study-from-fourWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-assessment-stakeholder-concerns-20260321/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nmm-assessment-stakeholder-concerns-20260321/Stakeholder conversations surface teacher deskilling and pupils’ wish to be read seriously. Original publication date: 2026-03-21 A company account of conversations; environmental and exam-scoring figures were not independently checked. https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/the-ethics-of-ai-assessment-fiveWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000assessmentteachingpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nigeria-copilot-rct-20250519/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/nigeria-copilot-rct-20250519/A teacher-supported six-week programme improved paper-test outcomes, with important attrition and design caveats. Original publication date: 2025-05-19 Working paper; short-term outcomes, volunteer participation and substantial attrition. Schooling-equivalent years are a conversion, not observed retention. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099548105192529324 https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099548105192529324/pdf/IDU-c09f40d8-9ff8-42dc-b315-591157499be7.pdf https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/people/m/maria-barronWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/learnlm-eedi-supervised-rct-20251111/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/learnlm-eedi-supervised-rct-20251111/An exploratory 165-student trial retains message-by-message human supervision and uncertain transfer estimates. Original publication date: 2025-11-11 Vendor-involved exploratory study; short-term platform outcomes and message-level supervision, without long-term independent testing. https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/LearnLM/learnLM_nov25.pdf https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23633 https://substack.nomoremarking.com/p/maybe-llm-tutors-might-be-able-toWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachinglearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/eef-chatgpt-planning-rct-20241212/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/eef-chatgpt-planning-rct-20241212/A 259-teacher trial supports planning-time savings without establishing higher student learning. Original publication date: 2024-12-12 RCT findings read from official results summaries; full evaluation report and appendices not audited. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/news/teachers-using-chatgpt-alongside-a-guide-to-support-them-to-use-it-effectively-can-cut-lesson-planning-time-by-over-30-per-cent https://www.nfer.ac.uk/blogs/ai-help-or-hindrance/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000teachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bastani-guardrails-learning-20250625/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/bastani-guardrails-learning-20250625/A mathematics RCT directly separates assisted performance from subsequent unaided assessment. Original publication date: 2025-06-25 One school, four review sessions and immediate similar-problem exams; not long-term retention or far transfer. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2422633122Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:44:18 +0000learningassessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/zarrow-generative-ai-studio-20260729/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/zarrow-generative-ai-studio-20260729/Laura Zarrow describes a studio course using critique and timed design exercises to develop judgment through making. Original publication date: 2026-07-29 The byline and citation date is 29 July; structured first-publication data says 20 July. The first date is disputed. https://gail.wharton.upenn.edu/research-and-insights/enduring-methods-emerging-medium/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachinglearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-understanding-20260702/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-understanding-20260702/Chongqing uses Hinton’s account of understanding to question what learners lose when AI explanations become too smooth. Original publication date: 2026-07-02 The official transcript may contain recognition errors; Hinton’s original talk was not independently read. https://shishufeng.com/episode/what_is_understanding/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000learningtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-teaching-ai-novices-20260319/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-teaching-ai-novices-20260319/The hosts find that tacit knowledge about files, versions and structure often explains beginners’ difficulties. Original publication date: 2026-03-19 Tool capabilities describe the training context at that time; the English title is translated. https://shishufeng.com/episode/AI_for_normies/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-research-literacy-20260813/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-research-literacy-20260813/Hanyang and Liushou discuss moving from an unfamiliar topic to a syllabus, search terms and original sources. Original publication date: 2026-08-13 Search coverage was not verified; prompts and download suggestions in the program were not executed. https://shishufeng.com/episode/zhaoziliao/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000learningteachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-exam-life-paths-20260615/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-exam-life-paths-20260615/Hanyang and Chongqing use university choices to question the idea that one decision fixes an entire life path. Original publication date: 2026-06-15 Population, employment and credential-return claims were not checked; the English title is translated. https://shishufeng.com/episode/gaokao/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000theorylearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-course-purpose-20260911/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-course-purpose-20260911/Chongqing and participant Mizai revisit how a music course found its themes and used live demonstrations. Original publication date: 2026-09-11 A reflection on one public course; the English title is an editorial translation. https://shishufeng.com/episode/20th_century_instrument_1/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-course-ai-reading-20260917/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/shishufeng-course-ai-reading-20260917/The second retrospective describes AI-built demonstrations and source navigation, while exposing the limits of keyword retrieval. Original publication date: 2026-09-17 Capability descriptions are limited to the systems and experiences the author describes. https://shishufeng.com/episode/20th_century_instrument_2/transcriptWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-post-apocalyptic-education-20240830/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-post-apocalyptic-education-20240830/This 2024 essay distinguishes confidence in AI detection from the illusion that completed homework means learning. Original publication date: 2024-08-30 https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/post-apocalyptic-educationWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000assessmentteachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-choosing-stay-human-20260526/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-choosing-stay-human-20260526/Mollick considers how convenient AI defaults can bypass the effort through which people develop valued abilities. Original publication date: 2026-05-26 School-year equivalents are not repeated as observed outcomes; product examples are not current instructions. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/choosing-to-stay-humanWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000learningteachingtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-against-brain-damage-20250707/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-against-brain-damage-20250707/Mollick challenges sensational interpretations of AI studies and examines learning, idea generation and writing practices. Original publication date: 2025-07-07 The cited research is commentary on the results available at that time. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/against-brain-damageWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000learningteachingtheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/li-zhengtao-education-shapes-ai-20260222/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/li-zhengtao-education-shapes-ai-20260222/Li Zhengtao argues that educational purposes should shape technology, protecting students’ own thinking and lived learning. Original publication date: 2026-02-22 Claims such as “irreplaceable” are the author’s positions; English is an editorial paraphrase. https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32592743 https://ed.ecnu.edu.cn/6a/74/c45970a748148/page.htmWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000theoryteachinglearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/hung-yi-lee-ai-evaluation-20251020/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/hung-yi-lee-ai-evaluation-20251020/This public lesson extends AI literacy to evaluation: metrics, human preferences, model judges and benchmark contamination. Original publication date: 2025-10-20 Uploaded on 20 October; the class was on 17 October. Slides were read, without a full spoken transcript. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWQVY_h0YXU https://speech.ee.ntu.edu.tw/~hylee/GenAI-ML/2025-fall-course-data/Evaluation.pdf https://speech.ee.ntu.edu.tw/~hylee/GenAI-ML/2025-fall.phpWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachingtoolsassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/hui-university-automated-knowledge-20260304/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/hui-university-automated-knowledge-20260304/Yuk Hui asks what universities lose when knowledge production and economic utility become their defining purposes. Original publication date: 2026-03-04 Future automation is the author’s proposal; the Chinese title is an editorial translation. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/161/6776851/the-university-within-the-limits-of-automated-knowledgeWed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000theoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gopnik-childhood-learning-cultural-ai-20251217/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gopnik-childhood-learning-cultural-ai-20251217/Gopnik connects exploration, apprenticeship and AI literacy in an interview that preserves disagreement about machine reasoning. Original publication date: 2025-12-17 The interview preserves disagreement; recording predates publication. https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/alison-gopnik/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000learningtheoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-prompt-contingency-20250304/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-prompt-contingency-20250304/Repeated tests illustrate why a successful answer does not establish a reliable prompting technique. Original publication date: 2025-03-04 Model/benchmark-specific evidence. The suggested classroom use is an editorial inference. https://gail.wharton.upenn.edu/research-and-insights/tech-report-prompt-engineering-is-complicated-and-contingent/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-grading-prompt-injections-20260402/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-grading-prompt-injections-20260402/A Wharton team tests how embedded instructions affect AI grading, finding important differences across models and conditions. Original publication date: 2026-04-02 Specific models, rubric, papers and simple plaintext attacks; not evidence that AI grading is generally secure or valid. https://gail.wharton.upenn.edu/research-and-insights/hidden-prompt-injections/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000assessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-expert-personas-20251207/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/gail-expert-personas-20251207/This report tests whether assigning expert identities reliably improves answers to difficult factual questions. Original publication date: 2025-12-07 Tests factual-question accuracy, not the full value of roleplay, writing style or pedagogical dialogue. https://gail.wharton.upenn.edu/research-and-insights/playing-pretend-expert-personas/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 09:39:29 +0000teachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/zhang-human-value-ai-parenting-20261001/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/zhang-human-value-ai-parenting-20261001/Educator Zhang Shuling questions defining children’s worth through an ever-expanding list of abilities AI cannot yet perform. Useful capacities matter, but do not exhaust the purpose of education. Original publication date: 2026-10-01 The English title is an editorial translation. https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/6002663Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theorylearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-teacher-ai-framework-20240808/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-teacher-ai-framework-20240808/UNESCO outlines 15 teacher competencies across five dimensions and three progression levels, supporting teacher development and assessment design while foregrounding ethics, human agency and pedagogy. Original publication date: 2024-08-08 Based on the official publication description; not all language editions were read. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachersWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingpolicytheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-iite-teacher-frameworks-20260928/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-iite-teacher-frameworks-20260928/The UNESCO IITE–Shanghai Open University project compares 36 teacher AI competency frameworks, examining competencies, implementation and assessment across policy, curriculum and teaching practice. Original publication date: 2026-09-28 Based on the official announcement; the full report was not read. https://iite.unesco.org/news/unesco-iite-has-released-the-analytical-report-teacher-ai-competency-frameworks/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingassessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-iesalc-lac-ai-20260908/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-iesalc-lac-ai-20260908/Across 200 higher education institutions in 19 countries, 87% reported AI use in at least one area, while 26% had a formal AI strategy. The report calls for stronger governance and institutional capability. Original publication date: 2026-09-08 Figures come from the publisher’s summary. The full report and sampling method were not checked, so percentages are not estimates for all universities or regions. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-implementation-higher-education-latin-america-and-caribbeanWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000policyteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-algorithm-room-20260908/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/unesco-algorithm-room-20260908/This UNESCO collection brings together 26 think pieces on agency, young people’s development, pedagogy, expression, public governance and educational futures. It broadens discussion beyond tool capabilities. Original publication date: 2026-09-08 Only the official publication description was read, not all 26 essays. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/algorithm-room-seeing-and-confronting-implications-ai-future-educationWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theoryassessmentpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/teqsa-adaptive-capabilities-20260624/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/teqsa-adaptive-capabilities-20260624/TEQSA’s commissioned report connects adaptive capabilities with disciplinary knowledge and learning-process evidence. It proposes process-focused assessment and support for student judgment, agency and self-regulation. Original publication date: 2026-06-24 The report explicitly is not TEQSA Guidance Notes or a uniform mandate. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/guides-resources/resources/corporate-publications/assuring-quality-learning-gen-ai-integrated-future-role-adaptive-capabilitiesWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000assessmentlearningpolicyhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/sumeracki-varied-retrieval-20260917/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/sumeracki-varied-retrieval-20260917/Sumeracki explains Butler et al.’s (2017) experiments contrasting repeated and varied application during retrieval practice. Her account invites asking whether an AI activity makes students retrieve, explain and apply concepts across contexts. Original publication date: 2026-09-17 The underlying paper was not read and its quantitative results were not independently checked; the AI application is an editorial inference. https://www.learningscientists.org/blog/2026/9/17Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theorylearningassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/stanford-k12-evidence-review-20260311/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/stanford-k12-evidence-review-20260311/A Stanford review identified 20 higher-quality causal studies within over 800 K12 AI papers available by October 2025. Assisted performance and unaided learning diverge; long-term, equity and wellbeing evidence remains limited. Original publication date: 2026-03-11 The review’s search ends in October 2025. This note follows the research-team explanation; individual included studies were not checked. https://scale.stanford.edu/research-in-action/understanding-evidence-base-ai-k12-educationWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000learningtheoryassessmenthttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/serc-student-ai-use-20250922/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/serc-student-ai-use-20250922/GeoAI connects AI-use boundaries to disciplinary goals: help with statistical concepts does not mean outsourcing climate-data interpretation. It suggests staged assignments, reflection and checked practice, with privacy and copyright considerations. Original publication date: 2025-09-22 https://serc.carleton.edu/geo_ai/student_ai.htmlWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingassessmentlearninghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/selwyn-critical-ai-talk-20261002/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/selwyn-critical-ai-talk-20261002/Selwyn calls for precise, contextual discussion of AI and warns against treating a power user’s experience as universal expertise. Constructive critique should ask what alternative forms of AI and educational practice people want. Original publication date: 2026-10-02 https://criticaledtech.com/2026/10/02/things-to-bear-in-mind-when-talking-about-ai-some-notes-for-the-critically-minded/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theoryteachinghttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-the-overhang-20260918/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/mollick-the-overhang-20260918/Mollick argues that expertise, breadth, taste and agency help people use AI capabilities. His experiments invite a question: how do learners acquire the knowledge and judgment needed to direct and evaluate increasingly capable tools? Original publication date: 2026-09-18 The educational application is an editorial reading question; linked demos and videos were not independently checked. https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/the-overhangWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theorylearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/meyer-ai-learning-tour-20260930/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/meyer-ai-learning-tour-20260930/Meyer highlights observations about teacher roles, curriculum fit, actionable suggestions and multilingual access, alongside disengaging uses. He asks how people actually use AI before treating capabilities as educational outcomes. Original publication date: 2026-09-30 Meyer discloses work on Amplify’s AI feature. These interviews and observations do not estimate causal effects; the full white paper was not read. https://danmeyer.substack.com/p/six-important-findings-from-the-aiWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingassessmenttoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/liu-ai-school-problem-finding-20260920/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/liu-ai-school-problem-finding-20260920/Liu reports on a program at Kaohsiung Girls’ Senior High School in Taiwan emphasizing problem selection, collaboration, AI-supported making and explaining concepts to other learners. Original publication date: 2026-09-20 This summary follows a single-school report. The linked radio program was not played; the pictured competition award dates to 2025. https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/480/article/17780Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachinglearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/jisc-ai-productivity-dip-20260922/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/jisc-ai-productivity-dip-20260922/Jisc proposes noticing unproductive interactions, judging what AI can reliably handle, and redesigning workflows. Institutions should allocate learning time; a useful outcome may be recognizing when not to use AI. Original publication date: 2026-09-22 https://nationalcentreforai.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2026/09/22/notice-judge-redesign-working-through-the-ai-productivity-dip/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/furze-good-use-brain-20260824/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/furze-good-use-brain-20260824/Furze proposes two contextual questions: is this a good use of the technology, and of the learner’s own thinking? He examines accessibility, outsourcing and assessment, questioning whether fixed categories capture individual needs. Original publication date: 2026-08-24 https://leonfurze.com/2026/08/24/is-this-a-good-use-of-the-technology-is-it-a-good-use-of-your-brain/Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000learningassessmenttheoryhttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/eef-aila-trial-20261006/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/eef-aila-trial-20261006/An English primary-school randomized trial found roughly 24% less planning time with Aila, about 49 minutes weekly, without inferior assessed resources. Use declined during the ten-week trial, and teacher views were mixed. Original publication date: 2026-10-06 The outcomes are planning time and resource quality, not student learning; control teachers could also use other AI. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/news/ai-tool-reduced-primary-teachers-lesson-planning-time-by-a-quarter-but-views-on-the-tool-were-mixedWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000teachingtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dwarkesh-matuschak-learning-tools-20230712/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/dwarkesh-matuschak-learning-tools-20230712/Matuschak distinguishes forgetting from never understanding, and discusses questioning, memory and fading scaffolds. The interview offers a lens for AI tools: do they help learners notice confusion and act, or mainly ease consumption? Original publication date: 2023-07-12 This is a 2023 interview, summarized from the full official transcript; audio and video were not played. The AI connection is an editorial reading question. https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/andy-matuschakWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000theorylearningtoolshttps://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/china-ai-education-action-plan-20260410/https://juanli.me/ai4education/en/items/china-ai-education-action-plan-20260410/The five-department action plan connects AI literacy, university curricula, teacher development, applications and safeguards, with goals for 2030. These are policy directions, not completed implementation or demonstrated learning effects. Original publication date: 2026-04-10 The webpage was published on 10 April; the document is dated 2 April. Local and school implementation requires separate checking. https://www.nda.gov.cn/sjj/zwgk/tzgg/0410/20260410162428109058250_pc.htmlWed, 07 Oct 2026 07:35:55 +0000policyteachingtools